Abstract
The concept of political judgement arose from a historical process, incorporating the thoughts of philosophers and thinkers such as Plato, Hobbes and Locke. While Plato was the first philosopher to use the term ‘political judgement’, Aristotle developed the concept, and Spinoza focused on ‘liberty of judgement’. While these philosophers were explaining the concept of political judgement, they mentioned a lot of varieties, such as rights, justice, freedom, law and equality (Ibid.). Even though some different points have been made by authors and political scientists in the definition and concept of political judgement and strategy, there is a strong connection between Berlin’s political judgement and the scope of strategy. This essay will firstly include Isaiah Berlin’s understanding of political judgement when considering different thoughts about political judgment. Secondly, it will analyse the scope of strategy by explaining the meaning of the strategy from different perspectives. Thirdly, it will criticise the relationship between political judgement and strategy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
