Abstract

Our article investigates political engagement among youth with and without an immigration background. Tapping to current debates on intergenerational assimilation processes in Europe, we look at differences in levels of political interest between immigrants, children of immigrants and natives. In particular, we argue that such differences are a function of respondents’ identification with the receiving society. We predict that among respondents with an immigrant background higher levels of national identification will be positively correlated with political interest. Among natives, political interest will not depend on levels of national identification. These expectations reflect the ideas of the social identity perspective according to which group identification increases adherence to group norms and adherence to norms is stronger among individuals who suffer from identity uncertainty. We test our model in four European countries: England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden, using data from the CILS4EU project. Our findings indicate that interest in the politics of the survey country differs between respondents with and without an immigrant background. Respondents with an immigrant background who also have a strong national identification are more likely to report a political interest than natives. Respondents with an immigrant background who have a low national identification, are less likely to report a political interest than natives. The findings also reveal that political discussions at home and associationism positively predict political interest whereas girls show significantly lower odds to be politically interested.

Highlights

  • Political interest indicates “the degree to which politics arouses a citizen’s curiosity” (van Deth, 1990, p. 278)

  • The results indicate that it is the children of immigrants who significantly differ from natives in their political interest and not the immigrants

  • We focus our attention on the issue of political interest, a key determinant of political assimilation, which until now remained understudied

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Political interest indicates “the degree to which politics arouses a citizen’s curiosity” (van Deth, 1990, p. 278). Despite its relevance as an indication of social integration and a future active citizenry, the development of interest in politics among young people with an immigrant background has rarely been examined. One exception in this regard is the PIDOP project, in which Kim and Amnâ (2015) for example, compared Iraqi and Kurdish immigrants and natives in Sweden. The contribution of peers to political engagement is large among young people who have not developed a political interest at home (García-Albacete, 2013; Neundorf, Niemi, & Smets, 2016). We test for a moderation of national identification in the relations between immigrant status and political interest

Political Engagement
Findings
Conclusions and Outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call