Abstract

I estimate the effects of uncertainty about candidates' ideological positions and institutionally imposed costs of voting on the likelihood that an individual turns out and votes. I do this using a simple model of turnout and vote choice that reflects the combined, simultaneous nature of vote decision-making. I show that the impact of eliminating the registration deadline and instituting DMV registration in the 1972-2000 presidential elections would have been less than that of eliminating uncertainty. Furthermore, I show that these changes would have had quite different impacts on the outcome of each election. The increased number of votes due to eliminating registration deadlines would generally have advantaged the Democratic candidates whereas the increased number of votes due to eliminating uncertainty would have advantaged candidates of both parties fairly equally over the course of the elections studied. This suggests that it may be more feasible to increase turnout with policies that aim to reduce uncertainty rather than with policies that aim to reduce registration barriers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.