Abstract

We analyze non-cooperative international climate policy in a setting of political competition by national interest groups. In the first stage, countries decide whether to link their domestic emission permit markets to an international market, which only forms if it is supported by all countries. In the second stage, countries non-cooperatively decide on the number of tradable emission allowances. In both stages, special interest groups try to sway the government in their favor. We find that (i) both the choice of regime and the levels of domestic and global emissions only depend on the aggregate levels of organized stakes in all countries and not on their distribution among individual interest groups and (ii) an increase in lobbying influence by a particular lobby group may backfire by inducing a change towards the lobby group's less preferred regime.

Highlights

  • When analyzing international policy, we often consider individual countries to be represented by a single benevolent decision maker, e.g. a government, acting in the best interest of the country as a whole

  • By political competition we mean that incumbent politicians do consider the welfare of the general electorate but are susceptible to the influence of lobby groups which try to sway them in their favor by providing campaign contributions, information or bribes

  • Lobby groups are assumed to maximize the total pay-off of their members, which is the organized stakes in national social welfare UiRj that the lobby group j in country i represents minus lobbying contributions in the first and second stage: Lij = UiRj − Ci1j,R + Ci2j,R, (3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When analyzing international (environmental) policy, we often consider individual countries to be represented by a single benevolent decision maker, e.g. a government, acting in the best interest of the country as a whole. If a permit market has been put in place, an additional term enters the welfare function which captures the revenues from permit sales or the costs associated with permit purchases Within this framework, we analyze how national lobbying influences non-cooperative international environmental policy and if (and how) the distribution of special interest groups affects the equilibrium outcome. We find that the number of tradable or non-tradable emission allowances, depending on the type of regime, is determined by the aggregate level of organized stakes in both countries, as long as all lobby groups exhibit strictly positive contribution schedules. To determine the equilibrium in the first stage, we follow Grossman and Helpman (1995a) in their analysis of free trade agreements In contrast to their model setting, our model comprises a continuous policy variable in the second stage, the number of tradable or non-tradable allowances.

The model
Non-cooperative international climate policy
Political actors
Structure of the game
The second stage
National emissions caps under lobby group pressure
International permit markets under lobby group pressure
Permit market equilibrium
Issuance of emissions permits
Global emissions with and without trading
The first stage
Second stage equilibrium contributions
Unilateral stances
The choice of regime
International permit markets
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.