Abstract

Abstract Over the past two decades, political ecologists have provided extensive critiques of the privatization, commodification, and marketization of nature, including of the new forms of accumulation and appropriation that these might facilitate under the more recent guise of green growth and the green economy. These critiques have often demonstrated that such approaches can retain deleterious implications for certain vulnerable populations across the developing world and beyond. With few exceptions, however, political ecologists have paid decidedly less attention to expounding upon alternative initiatives for pursuing both sustainability and socio-environmental justice. Accordingly, the contributions to this Special Section engage the concept of the green economy explicitly as a terrain of struggle, one inevitably conditioned by the variegated forms that actually-existing 'green economy' strategies ultimately take in specific historical and geographical conjunctures. In doing so, they highlight the ways in which there is likewise not one but many potential sustainabilities for pursuing human and non-human well-being in the ostensibly nascent Anthropocene, each of which reflects alternative – and, potentially, more progressive – constellations of social, political, and economic relations. Yet they also foreground diverse efforts to pre-empt or to foreclose upon these alternatives, highlighting an implicit politics of precisely whose conception of sustainability is deemed to be possible or desirable in any given time and place. In exploring such struggles over alternative sustainabilities and the 'ecologies of hope' that they implicitly offer, then, this introduction first reviews the current frontiers of these debates, before illuminating how the contributions to this issue both intersect with and build upon them. Key words: Green economy; political ecology; political economy; alternative sustainabilities

Highlights

  • Over the past two decades, political ecologists have provided extensive critiques of the privatization, commodification, and marketization of nature, including of the new forms of accumulation and appropriation that these might facilitate under the more recent guise of green growth and the green economy

  • This emerging policy field has attracted the attention of political ecologists and other critical scholars of development, who have begun to explore the various ways in which these initiatives Journal of Political Ecology

  • We explore in more detail this theme of the green economy's variegated implementation in specific places, drawing in particular upon recent work in critical development studies and related fields

Read more

Summary

Cavanagh and Benjaminsen

The political ecology of the Green Economy spécifiques. Ce faisant, ils mettent en évidence les façons dont il n'y a pas non plus une seule, mais de nombreuses possibilités de maintien pour la poursuite du bien-être humain et non humain dans l'Anthropocène naissant. – while a turn towards green(er) economies and development pathways might admittedly lead us toward a certain version of 'sustainable development' – these broad concepts are subject to a wide range of interpretations, power struggles, vested interests, and, the vagaries of their geographically-specific implementation. This emerging policy field has attracted the attention of political ecologists and other critical scholars of development, who have begun to explore the various ways in which these initiatives

Journal of Political Ecology
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call