Abstract
Positive and negative spillovers from private activities onto aggregate economic outcomes are empirically significant. How might politics interact with private investment incentives and their externalities? Our theory connects politics to policies which distort private spillovers. This has implications for empirical identification. In our model, for large negative externality there is a unique equilibrium with perpetually high tax rates and majority poor voters. This is a consequence of political manipulation that anticipates private spillovers on forward-looking investment decisions. When positive spillovers are sufficiently large, individuals can coordinate on policies that encourage private investment. This sustains an equilibrium with perpetually low tax rates and majority rich voters. The resulting multiple equilibria can be used to interpret existing conundrums in empirical findings. We can also rationalize an observed cross-country empirical regularity in terms of public funding for knowledge goods and income inequality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.