Abstract
This paper endeavors to investigate the relationship between political connections and M&A performance and the effect of family ownership on this relationship. We find that political connections reduce M&A performance in nonfamily firms and family firms with political connections have higher M&A performance than their nonconnected counterparts, implying that family involvement in management can mitigate the negative effect of political connection on firms’ M&A performance. Supplementary tests indicate that firms with good corporate governance mechanism have higher market response and there is a substitution relationship between political connections and corporate governance quality in their effect on M&A performance. In the effect on long-term M&A performance, political connection have a substitution relationship with firms’ market competition for nonfamily firms and can strengthen the positive effect of market competition for family firms. Our results remain significant when considering alterative definition of family firm and variable substitution. We contribute to the literature focusing on the interaction between political connections and firm performance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.