Abstract
How political capital affects physical capital investment is controversial in the literature. This paper explains the contradictory relationship between political and physical capitals. Using an exogenous shock (leading to a sudden reduction in political capital) and the DID estimation, we find that physical capital complements political capital for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) while this relationship is substitutional for private firms. This result can be explained by the changes in firms' economic performance after the reduction in political capital. Our findings provide an important policy implication. That is, governments should lessen policy burdens on SOEs and reduce institutional discrimination against private firms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
