Abstract

Latin American legislatures have been characterized as reactive, as they respond to presidential initiatives rather than creating their own. While this tells us what role the executive will play vis-à-vis the legislature, it does not tell us much about which bills are likely to become law. Using data from the Colombian legislation between 1986– 1990 and 1994–1998, we examine the determinants of policymaking by assessing the impact that partisanship, co-sponsorship, authorship (executive vs. legislature), and bill content/target (national vs. local/parochial) have on bill passage. After controlling for other potential influences, results suggest that presidents are proactive, nationally focused, and more successful in getting legislation passed. Moreover, the partisan identification of the bill’s author, the number of co-sponsors, and the workload of the committee to which a bill is assigned all affect the fate of legislation. Determining which bills succeed and which fail offers insights into the process of lawmaking in legislatures generally.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.