Abstract

The use of research in public health policymaking is one of the prerequisites for successfully implemented health policies which have better population health as an outcome. This policy process is influenced by the actors involved under the policy umbrella, with inter-related contextual factors and specific structural and institutional circumstances. Our study investigates how policymakers’ research capacities influence the use of research in the health policy process and identify areas where capacity-building interventions give the most meaning and impact. Furthermore, we investigate policymakers’ research engagement and use this to inform public health policy in the public sector in Denmark. We collect and report data using Seeking, Engaging with, and Evaluation Research (SEER) methodology. Policymakers are reported to have research capacity, but it is questionable how those competences have actually been used in policymaking. Decision-makers were often not aware or did not know about the existing organizational tools and systems for research engagement and use and two third of respondents had not been part of any research activities or had any collaboration with researchers. Overall, research use in public health policymaking and evaluation was limited. As a conclusion, we propose that capacity-building interventions for increasing research use and collaboration in EIPM should be context-oriented, measurable, and sustainable in developing individual and organizational competences.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAs in all policy processes, the health policy process is influenced by the actors involved, inter-related contextual factors, as well as structural and institutional circumstances [3]

  • This study aims to investigate the association between research capacity and research use among health policymakers in Denmark so that areas for improvement can be identi

  • They believe that their organizations need more research evidence in health policymaking, but they are still unaware of the organizational tools and systems for research engagements and use, and the actual, concrete organizational research involvement in producing new evidence

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As in all policy processes, the health policy process is influenced by the actors involved, inter-related contextual factors, as well as structural and institutional circumstances [3]. Research evidence is only one factor contributing to policy decisions [5,6,7,8]. All these different kinds of influences are well presented by the SPIRIT Action Framework [9] (see Figure 1). This framework is based on and covers recent theories on research engagement and use, knowledge exchange and the connections to policymakers’ research capacities

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call