Policy-specific human rights shaming: Evidence from the other letters of the UN Special Procedures

Abstract

This study provides empirical insights into “other letters” (OLs) issued by the UN Special Procedures, a unique tool of policy-specific human rights shaming. By analyzing criticized laws, recipients, state responses, and impact, the study reveals that OLs are predominantly targeted at cooperative states. Despite better human rights records, democracies receive more OLs and they are more likely to implement the recommendations. Authoritarian states receive fewer OLs and tend to reject the allegations. The study highlights the intricate dynamics shaping interactions between UN human rights mechanisms and states, emphasizing democratic responsiveness while underscoring the challenges of addressing abuses in nondemocratic settings.