Abstract

This article aims to open up debate on the policy implications of ageing sexualities. The article begins by discussing the heteronormative perspective that frames current discourse on older people's needs and citizenship. It then presents data from an empirical study to highlight the concerns that older lesbians and gay men have about housing, health and social service provision, work and job security, and relationship recognition. The article illustrates how the heterosexual assumption that informs policy making can limit the development of effective strategies for supporting older lesbians and gay men; and raises broader questions about policy making, social inclusion and citizenship.

Highlights

  • Recent years have witnessed a growing recognition among researchers, policy makers and social service providers of the changing and diverse living circumstances of the older population (e.g. Minichiello, Browne and Kending, 2000; Bernard and Phillips, 2000)

  • Some argue that policy makers must recognise the older population as consumers of services, and ‘citizens’ (Simey, 1998: 254)

  • As an ‘unseen minority’ (Brown, Sarosy, Cook and Quarto, 1997), the specific concerns of older lesbians and gay men, and the implications of their sexual identities for compromised citizenship in later life, are issues that have hitherto been largely neglected by policy makers, advocates for older people and lesbian and gay communities (Cahill, South and Spade, 2000)

Read more

Summary

Policy Implications of Ageing Sexualities

This article aims to open up debate on the policy implications of ageing sexualities. The article begins by discussing the heteronormative perspective that frames current discourse on older people’s needs and citizenship. It presents data from an empirical study to highlight the concerns that older lesbians and gay men have about housing, health and social service provision, work and job security, and relationship recognition. The article illustrates how the heterosexual assumption that informs policy making can limit the development of effective strategies for supporting older lesbians and gay men; and raises broader questions about policy making, social inclusion and citizenship

Introduction
Brief description of the study and the sample
Type of living arrangement
Health needs and social services
Work and job security
Relationship recognition
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.