Abstract
In policy fields where regulatory science underpins government decision making, barriers to policy learning tend to be more entrenched. Presented with new and improved scientific methods and technologies, a key question increasingly facing regulatory authorities is how best to adapt established procedures without alienating stakeholders who value stability and low regulatory uncertainty? Focusing on the highly institutionalized field of environmental chemical risk assessment and drawing on recent advances in the conceptualization and operationalization of policy learning and policy forums, this paper explores factors linked to individuals and forum dynamics that encourage policy learning in fields underpinned by regulatory science. Using survey research, we analyze the learning experiences reported by policy actors who participated in an international ecotoxicology policy forum. Results suggest that open, balanced, and professional norm-driven forums will not necessarily produce efficient policy learning in fields underpinned by regulatory science due to motivated skepticism insomuch as forum participants are acutely aware that scientific advance may introduce uncertainty into regulatory processes and outcomes. Results also suggest that the longevity of actors’ forum participation is important to facilitate learning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.