Abstract
Demands for the development of special education policies by state and local educational agencies are increasing as federally mandated state education agency (SEA) administrative activities and state and federal special education litigation expand. Federal regulatory provisions provide a superstructure within which numerous policy vacuums or gaps exist. If left unfilled, these policy vacuums often become the target of administrative and judicial litigation. Federal courts and enforcement agencies often are eager to defer to state and local special education policy-making when it occurs in advance of litigation and when, in response to operational problems and questions, it contains reasonable educational and administrative answers expressed clearly and in measurable terms. By developing special education policy in this proactive manner, state and local education agencies can retain control over education decision making.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.