Abstract

Police victim and witness interviewing in a northern Canadian territory with a predominantly Indigenous population was examined across two studies. In study 1, an Internet survey about interview training, practices and cross-cultural issues was completed by serving police officers (N = 37). In study 2, transcripts of interviews with Indigenous adult victims and witnesses (N = 20) were coded for the presence of various interviewing practices (e.g. question types, interruptions, talking time). Survey results showed that most officers were untrained in scientific-interviewing protocols but were aware of the general practices that constitute a competent interview (e.g. building rapport, requesting a free narrative). Most respondents indicated that cultural differences impact their interviewing style. Results of the transcript analysis showed that officers violated the 80/20 talking rule in 90% of the interviews and unproductive question types (e.g. closed yes/no) were used often. All interviews contained a request for a full account, most interviews contained elements of active listening and few interruptions were observed. These findings are discussed with reference to how interviewing and cross-cultural communication training could help police organizations who serve Indigenous populations. Future research should consider whether established international best practices for interviewing are effective in settings with Indigenous victims and witnesses.

Highlights

  • Research has shown that police officers tend to ask a flurry of questions and steer the discussion when gathering information from victims or witnesses (Eades 2010; Heydon 2005; Thornborrow 2002)

  • Interviews conducted by police officers with limited training are perfunctory exercises, demonstrating low skill and unreasonable levels of conversational control (Clifford and George 1996; Fisher et al 1987; Griffiths et al 2011; MacDonald et al 2017; Wright and Alison 2004)

  • In examining the correspondence between what police officers in Northern Canada thought about their interviewing skills and the reality of practice, we found discrepancies, and little-to-no use of CI components, the more complex ones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research has shown that police officers tend to ask a flurry of questions and steer the discussion when gathering information from victims or witnesses (Eades 2010; Heydon 2005; Thornborrow 2002). Interviews conducted by police officers with limited training are perfunctory exercises, demonstrating low skill and unreasonable levels of conversational control (Clifford and George 1996; Fisher et al 1987; Griffiths et al 2011; MacDonald et al 2017; Wright and Alison 2004). To counteract these tendencies, an evidence-based best practice. The use of multiple retrieval cues was shown to help interviewees access more information about a witnessed event (Fisher 2010). Fisher and Geiselman enhanced the CI by incorporating theories of social dynamics (e.g. rapport building) and communication (e.g. transference of control; Fisher et al 1990; Fisher and Geiselman 1992)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.