Abstract

Pole tip recession (PTR) results in an increase in spacing between recording elements and magnetic media which is undesirable for high-density recording. The effects of air bearing surface (ABS) designs, pole tip region designs and carbon coating on the growth of PTR with increasing start-stop cycles have been investigated. A better ABS design for less PTR should reduce contact time between slider and disk during take-off and landing of the slider. Among the two-rail, tail-dragger and negative pressure sliders, the negative pressure slider has shortest contact time during take-off and landing, followed by the two-rail slider and tail-dragger slider. The growth mechanisms of PTR for two-rail slider with or without U-shaped slot consists of knocking-off protruded poles, generation of wear particles and three-body abrasive wear. The PTR reaches a saturated value after a certain start-stop cycles. However, for the tail-dragger slider with square-shaped slot, there is a fourth step of erosion which leads to no saturation of PTR and a relatively rough surface of poles. Mechanisms of PTR for negative pressure slider is similar to the two-rail slider but with a lower saturated PTR value. Carbon coating minimizes or eliminates the PTR growth through reducing static and kinetic friction during take-off and landing, providing a wear-resistant protective layer and eliminating dissimilarities of ABS, thin film structure and poles. Based on this study, we find that negative pressure slider which minimizes contact at head-disk interface and carbon coating which protects thin-film region are desirable alternatives for slider designs. Initial recession is desirable as compared to protrusion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call