Abstract

Polarographic chemometric methods were applied to the determination of zinc and nickel in aqueous solutions previously acidified with 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH 4.2). The studied methods are multivariate methods including classical least squares (CLS), principal component regression (PCR) and partial least squares (PLS); derivative ratio methods (first, 1D and second, 2D derivative ratio). A comparative study was considered. The studied chemometric methods do not need the presence of any reduction potential shift reagent in spite of the great overlap between the two metals polarograms. A training set consisting of 10 binary mixture solutions in the possible combinations containing 0.13–9.30 μg/ml Zn(II) and 0.20–12.25 μg/ml Ni(II) was used to develop the chemometric calibrations (CLS, PCR and PLS). A validation set containing the synthetic mixtures in the range of 0.29–9.00 μg/ml for Zn(II) and 0.30–11.60 μg/ml for Ni(II) was used to validate the multivariate calibrations. Same mixtures were used to develop the derivative ratio methods. The polarograms were recorded and their current values were measured within the potential range −920 to −1052 mV at 2 mV intervals. The mean percentage recoveries obtained using CLS, PCR and PLS were found to be 99.5 ± 1.5%, 100.0 ± 1.1% and 100.0 ± 1.0% for Zn(II) and 99.4 ± 1.3%, 99.7 ± 1.2% and 99.9 ± 1.0% for Ni(II), respectively. The mean percentage recoveries obtained using 1D at −950 mV, 1D at −1010 mV, 1D at −950 mV– 1D at −1010 mV and 2D at −986 mV for Zn(II) were found to be 99.7 ± 1.2%, 99.2 ± 1.6%, 99.4 ± 1.4% and 99.4 ± 1.4%; and using 1D at −1030 mV and 2D at −1010 mV for Ni(II) were found to be 100.5 ± 1.3% and 100.4 ± 1.3%, respectively. Interferences due to the presence of Cd, Co, Pb, Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg, Cu and Al were studied. The applicability of the proposed methods was assessed through the determination of both metals in tap drinking-water. Samples were subjected if required up to a 20-fold preconcentration step by microwaving in pyrex vessels. The results were compared with those obtained using the zincon and the heptoxime colorimetric reference methods for the determination of zinc and nickel, respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call