Abstract

Studying the longitudinally polarized fraction of $W^\pm W^\pm$ scattering at the LHC is crucial to examine the unitarization mechanism of the vector boson scattering amplitude through Higgs and possible new physics. We apply here for the first time a Deep Neural Network classification to extract the longitudinal fraction. Based on fast simulation implemented with the Delphes framework, significant improvement from a deep neural network is found to be achievable and robust over all dijet mass region. A conservative estimation shows that a high significance of four standard deviations can be reached with the High-Luminosity LHC designed luminosity of 3000 $fb^{-1}$

Highlights

  • Studying the longitudinally polarized fraction of WÆWÆ scattering at the LHC is crucial to examine the unitarization mechanism of the vector boson scattering amplitude through Higgs and possible new physics

  • The High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) will measure for the first time many novel processes predicted by standard model (SM), and study precisely especially those involving pure electroweak interactions such as vector boson scattering (VBS)

  • Same charge WÆWÆ scattering has been observed by CMS and ATLAS with a significance larger tphaffisffin1⁄4513stTanedVa,rdcodrreevsipaotinodnisn,gbtaoseadn on data collected at integrated luminosity of approximately 35.9 fb−1 [1,2]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Studying the longitudinally polarized fraction of WÆWÆ scattering at the LHC is crucial to examine the unitarization mechanism of the vector boson scattering amplitude through Higgs and possible new physics. The High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) will measure for the first time many novel processes predicted by standard model (SM), and study precisely especially those involving pure electroweak interactions such as vector boson scattering (VBS). [7] applied a regression with a deep neural network (DNN) to recover the lepton angular distributions in the W boson rest frame, and shows that the expected accuracy can be improved by about a factor of two compared to the use of RpT .

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.