Polarity induction versus phototropism in maize: Auxin cannot replace blue light

Abstract

In a previous study (Nick and Schafer 1991, Planta 185, 415–424), unilateral blue light had been shown, in maize coleoptiles, to induce phototropism and a stable transverse polarity, which became detectable as stable curvature if counteracting gravitropic stimulation was removed by rotation on a horizontal clinostat. This response was accompanied by a reorientation of cortical microtubules in the outer epidermis (Nick et al. 1990, Planta 181, 162–168). In the present study, this stable transverse polarity is shown to be correlated with stability of microtubule orientation against blue light and changes of auxin content. The role of auxin in this stabilisation was assessed. Although auxin can induce reorientation of microtubules it fails to induce the stabilisation of microtubule orientation induced by blue light. This was even true for gradients of auxin able to induce a bending response similar to that ellicited by phototropic stimulation. Experiments involving partial irradiation demonstrated different perception sites for phototropism and polarity induction. Phototropism starts from the very coleoptile tip and involves transmission of a signal (auxin) towards the subapical elongation zone. In contrast, polarity induction requires local action of blue light in the elongation zone itself. This blue-light response is independent of auxin.