Abstract

IntroductionPure invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a special type of breast carcinoma characterised by clusters of cells presenting polarity abnormalities. The biological alterations underlying this pattern remain unknown.MethodsPangenomic analysis (n = 39), TP53 (n = 43) and PIK3CA (n = 41) sequencing in a series of IMPCs were performed. A subset of cases was also analysed with whole-exome sequencing (n = 4) and RNA sequencing (n = 6). Copy number variation profiles were compared with those of oestrogen receptors and grade-matched invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) of no special type.ResultsUnsupervised analysis of genomic data distinguished two IMPC subsets: one (Sawtooth/8/16) exhibited a significant increase in 16p gains (71%), and the other (Firestorm/Amplifier) was characterised by a high frequency of 8q (35%), 17q (20% to 46%) and 20q (23% to 30%) amplifications and 17p loss (74%). TP53 mutations (10%) were more frequently identified in the amplifier subset, and PIK3CA mutations (4%) were detected in both subsets. Compared to IDC, IMPC exhibited specific loss of the 6q16-q22 region (45%), which is associated with downregulation of FOXO3 and SEC63 gene expression. SEC63 and FOXO3 missense mutations were identified in one case each (2%). Whole-exome sequencing combined with RNA sequencing of IMPC allowed us to identify somatic mutations in genes involved in polarity, DNAH9 and FMN2 (8% and 2%, respectively) or ciliogenesis, BBS12 and BBS9 (2% each) or genes coding for endoplasmic reticulum protein, HSP90B1 and SPTLC3 (2% each) and cytoskeleton, UBR4 and PTPN21 (2% each), regardless of the genomic subset. The intracellular biological function of the mutated genes identified by gene ontology analysis suggests a driving role in the clinicopathological characteristics of IMPC.ConclusionIn our comprehensive molecular analysis of IMPC, we identified numerous genomic alterations without any recurrent fusion genes. Recurrent somatic mutations of genes participating in cellular polarity and shape suggest that they, together with other biological alterations (such as epigenetic modifications and stromal alterations), could contribute to the morphological pattern of IMPC. Though none of the individual abnormalities demonstrated specificity for IMPC, whether their combination in IMPC may have a cumulative effect that drives the abnormal polarity of IMPC needs to be examined further with in vitro experiments.

Highlights

  • Pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a special type of breast carcinoma characterised by clusters of cells presenting polarity abnormalities

  • IMPC tumours were predominantly pT1N1 Oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive with high rates of ERBB2 overexpression for T1 tumours The aim of this exploratory study was to decipher genomic alterations related to the specific morphology of IMPC tumours, that is, the inverted polarity of cells, organised in clusters separated from the extracellular matrix by a clear space (Figures 1A and 1B)

  • The 39 IMPC tumours subsequently analysed by Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 6.0 Array were compared to 27 ER-positive and grade-matched Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)-NSTs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) is a special type of breast carcinoma characterised by clusters of cells presenting polarity abnormalities. Recent comprehensive genomic studies have focused on the most common histological (that is, invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (IDC-NST) and lobular carcinoma) or polarised towards the outside. Researchers in two previous genomic studies based on small series of 16 and 10 cases, respectively [12,13], identified specific genomic patterns of IMPC, such as 8p losses, 8q gains and 17p and 16q losses in 50% to 100% of cases. These observations were confirmed by a recent study [14]. Compared to ER- and grade-matched IDC-NST, some genomic alterations were observed more predominantly in IMPC, such as amplification on chromosomes 8p, 8q and 17q

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.