Polarimetric Two-Scale Two-Component Model for the Retrieval of Soil Moisture Under Moderate Vegetation via L-Band SAR Data

Abstract

Recently, we have proposed a retrieval technique based on an original polarimetric two-scale model (PTSM), which is able to estimate the volumetric water content of bare soils from polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. In this paper, to extend the field of application of our retrieval technique to moderately vegetated soils, we combine the PTSM with a randomly oriented dipole-cloud volumetric scattering model, thus obtaining a polarimetric two-scale two-component model (PTSTCM). By using this model we show that, in principle, suitable combinations of the polarimetric SAR channels, i.e., “modified copolarized ratio” and “modified copolarized correlation coefficient,” are related only to the surface parameters because the dependence on the unknown volumetric contribution intensity cancels out. This allows us to retrieve soil moisture from L-band SAR data not only for bare soils but also in moderately vegetated areas, interested by a nonnegligible volumetric scattering contribution, provided that the double-bounce scattering component is negligible. In addition, describing the surface component by using the PTSM allows us to mitigate the well-known problem of overestimating the volume component, which affects most model-based target decompositions and that may lead to the so-called “negative power problem.” Both the performance and validity limits of the estimation method are assessed by comparing the obtained soil-moisture retrieval results to “ in situ ” measurements. To this aim, data from SMEX'03 and AGRISAR'06 campaigns available in literature are considered. They refer to sites with a flat topography. In particular, we employ the AGRISAR database, which includes data from several fields covering a period that spans all the phases of vegetation growth, to explore the validity range of the method in terms of vegetation height. Results of PTSTCM are also compared with those of available three-component methods (3CMs) employing more simplified surface scattering models. It has turned out that the use of the PTSTCM provides more accurate results for low vegetation (average modulus of soil moisture relative error for vegetation height smaller than 50 cm: 18.5% for the PTSTCM and 34% for the 3CM). Conversely, for higher vegetation, 3CMs should be more conveniently employed (average modulus of relative error for vegetation height greater than 50 cm: 17.5% for the 3CM and about 100% for the PTSTCM). A simple method to adaptively and automatically (i.e., based on measured data) select between PTSTCM and 3CM on a pixel-by-pixel basis is finally suggested, leading to a less than 20% average modulus of relative error on the retrieved soil moisture for the considered fields over the entire vegetation growth cycle.