Abstract
The aim of this validation study was to compare prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) results from a point-of-care testing (POCT) device (Rapidpoint Coag) with those from standard laboratory tests. The subjects were newborn infants needing coagulation screen for any clinical indications within a regional neonatal intensive care unit. The level of agreement between POCT and laboratory measurements of PT and APTT was determined. For PT: the bias was from -7.6 to 12.4 s and precision was 5.0 s. For the detection of prolonged PT at a level of 16 s, the sensitivity was 0.70, specificity was 0.57 and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 0.62. For APTT: the bias was from -39.1 to 23.7 s, and precision was 15.7 s. For the detection of prolonged APTT at a level of 55 s, the sensitivity was 0.80, specificity was 0.95 and the PPV was 0.80. The POCT device tested has limited utility as a cot-side device for screening for a prolongation of the APTT in the newborn but is not sensitive for screening for prolongation of the PT.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
