Abstract

A hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the rearrangement of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptide to a non-native conformation that promotes the formation of toxic, nanoscale aggregates. Recent studies have pointed to the role of sample preparation in creating polymorphic fibrillar species. One of many potential pathways for Aβ toxicity may be modulation of lipid membrane function on cellular surfaces. There are several mutations clustered around the central hydrophobic core of Aβ near the α-secretase cleavage site (E22G Arctic mutation, E22K Italian mutation, D23N Iowa mutation, and A21G Flemish mutation). These point mutations are associated with hereditary diseases ranging from almost pure cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) to typical Alzheimer's disease pathology with plaques and tangles. We investigated how these point mutations alter Aβ aggregation in the presence of supported lipid membranes comprised of total brain lipid extract. Brain lipid extract bilayers were used as a physiologically relevant model of a neuronal cell surface. Intact lipid bilayers were exposed to predominantly monomeric preparations of Wild Type or different mutant forms of Aβ, and atomic force microscopy was used to monitor aggregate formation and morphology as well as bilayer integrity over a 12 hour period. The goal of this study was to determine how point mutations in Aβ, which alter peptide charge and hydrophobic character, influence interactions between Aβ and the lipid surface. While fibril morphology did not appear to be significantly altered when mutants were prepped similarly and incubated under free solution conditions, aggregation in the lipid membranes resulted in a variety of polymorphic aggregates in a mutation dependent manner. The mutant peptides also had a variable ability to disrupt bilayer integrity.

Highlights

  • The neuropathological and neurochemical hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) include: synaptic loss and selective neuronal cell death; decreases in markers for certain neurotransmitters; and abnormalities in neurons and their processes as well as in the extracellular space [1,2]

  • To compare the resulting morphological features of fibrils formed by Wild Type and the mutant forms of Ab under free solution conditions, 20 mM solutions of Wild Type, Arctic, Italian, Iowa, or Flemish Ab (1–40) were incubated at 37oC and sampled at various times to check for the presence of fibrils

  • While the presence of these specific mutations to alter the kinetics of Ab has been demonstrated, we were interested if, once formed, there were distinct fibrillar morphologies associated with the different mutations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The neuropathological and neurochemical hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) include: synaptic loss and selective neuronal cell death; decreases in markers for certain neurotransmitters; and abnormalities in neurons and their processes (neurofibrillary tangles comprised of Tau and dystrophic neurites) as well as in the extracellular space (cerebrovascular, diffuse, and neuritic plaques composed predominantly of the amyloidogenic peptide Ab) [1,2]. All AD patients develop neuritic plaques in brain regions subserving memory and cognition. These plaques consist of extracellular masses of Ab filaments and other plaque associated proteins (e.g. apoE, apoJ, inflammatory molecules) which are intimately associated with dystrophic dendrites and axons, activated microglia, and reactive astrocytes [3]. It has been well established that many amyloid forming peptides have the ability to aggregate into a variety of morphologically distinct and stable fibril structures [4]. At a gross morphological level, this ability to form distinct polymorphic fibril structures of

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.