Abstract

The state exemption from taxation of interest on municipal and local home-state bonds when other states' bond interest is subject to tax creates a difficult issue for dormant Commerce Clause analysis. Two state courts have considered the extraterritorial bond taxation issue and have come to opposite conclusions regarding its constitutionality. This Point examines the arguments presented by the two cases and by various commentators, including concerns about the vagueness of the dormant Commerce Clause discrimination concept, the difficulty of applying the market participant exception in this context, and the changes in the global financial markets. It suggests that the home state exemption, while perhaps misguided, should be permitted under a contemporary view of federalism and the relations among the states.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.