Abstract

This chapter focuses on the work of the Dutch poet Gerrit Achterberg who was hospitalised in a forensic psychiatric institution on the basis of an entrustment order after he killed his landlady. The diagnosis of the form and degree of Achterberg’s insanity was made on the basis of his poetry that his psychiatrists supposed was indicative of his sexual deviance and criminal state of mind. It is argued that the Achterberg case asks the legal professional to consider, firstly, how the institutional languages of law and forensic psychiatry often impose their conceptual frameworks to such a degree that other languages are excluded, and, secondly, to be aware of the interpretive pitfalls of one’s own linguistic usages because legal interpretation as a claim for meaning is a human activity, i.e. law is not found, it is made.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.