Abstract

As part of a network study of HIV infection among people who inject drugs (PWID) and their contacts, we discovered a connected subcomponent of 29 uninfected PWID. In the context of a just-declining large epidemic outbreak, this raised a question: What explains the existence of large pockets of uninfected people? Possible explanations include “firewall effects” (Friedman et al., 2000; Dombrowski et al., 2017) wherein the only HIV+ people that the uninfected take risks with have low viral loads; “bottleneck effects” wherein few network paths into the pocket of non-infection exist; low levels of risk behavior; and an impending outbreak. We considered each of these. Participants provided information on their enhanced sexual and injection networks and assisted us in recruiting network members. The largest connected component had 241 members. Data on risk behaviors in the last 6 months were collected at the individual level. Recent infection was determined by LAg (SediaTM Biosciences Corporation), data on recent seronegative tests, and viral load. HIV RNA was quantified using Artus HI Virus-1 RG RT-PCR (Qiagen). The 29 members of the connected subcomponent of uninfected participants were connected (network distance = 1) to 17 recently-infected and 24 long-term infected participants. Fourteen (48%) of these 29 uninfected were classified as “extremely high risk” because they self-reported syringe sharing and had at least one injection partner with viral load >100,000 copies/mL who also reported syringe sharing. Seventeen of the 29 uninfected were re-interviewed after 6 months, but none had seroconverted. These findings show the power of network research in discovering infection patterns that standard individual-level studies cannot. Theoretical development and exploratory network research studies may be needed to understand these findings and deepen our understanding of how HIV does and does not spread through communities. Finally, the methods developed here provide practical tools to study “bottleneck” and “firewall” network hypotheses in practice.

Highlights

  • We present a case study of a large sub-network of non-infection that we encountered during the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP)

  • Within this large connected component there was a subcomponent (i.e., “pocket”) of 29 connected uninfected people who inject drugs (PWID). These 29 participants and the participants with whom they had a direct risk network link are the focus of this paper

  • 4 such links were identified among our 29 negative pocket members and any of their direct network connections.)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We present a case study of a large sub-network of non-infection that we encountered during the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project (TRIP). In the course of this project, we discovered a large, connected sub-component of 29 uninfected people within a larger network that contained many recently-infected members. This paper explores how such a large connected “pocket” of the uninfected could exist. It considers three possible explanations for the existence of such a sub-network: 1. A network bottleneck can be said to exist if there are very few risk network links between a subnetwork of the uninfected and a subnetwork that contains infected people

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call