Abstract
In December 2020, the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) lead model-3501 was subject to a safety notification because of increased risk of fracture at a location just distal to the proximal sense ring. The manufacturer’s product performance report currently reports a lead survival probability of 98.8% at 45 months. However, no multicenter long-term performance information exists for this lead. To assess the longevity of model-3501 leads and to compare it with that of the previous model-3401. This analysis included consecutive patients who received an S-ICD with a model-3501 or a model-3401 lead at 66 Italian centers of the Rhythm Detect registry. A lead failed if it required extraction/replacement because of abnormalities suggestive of a structural defect, e.g. out-of-range impedance, nonphysiological electrical noise or ineffective therapy. From January 2013 to July 2021, 2403 patients were implanted and followed up (78% male, age 49±15years). A 3501-model lead was used in 1697 patients and a 3401-model in 706 patients. During a median follow-up of 38 months [25th-75th percentile: 24-55], we detected 4 malfunctioning model-3501 leads and 2 model-3401 leads. After analysis of the returned leads by the manufacturer’s technical services, a single model-3501 lead failure was a fracture distal to the proximal ring electrode, as described in the manufacturer’s advisory letter. No deaths or permanent injuries occurred as a result of lead failures. The survival of 3501-model leads at 4 years was 99.5% (95% C.I. 99.0 to 99.9) compared with 99.9% (95% C.I., 99.6 to 100.0) of 3401-model leads (P=0.110). The cumulative occurrence rate of the 3501-model safety notification fracture was 0.1% (95% C.I., 0.0 to 0.3). In this large multicenter analysis, the survival probability of model-3501 S-ICD leads was in line with that reported by the manufacturer, was not significantly lower than that of 3401-model leads (not affected by a safety notification), and still higher than that reported with transvenous leads. Although an enhanced electrode is now available, which addresses the potential for electrode body fracture, the present findings are reassuring and may have significant implications for the management of patients who have affected leads.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.