PO-01-104 3D MODELING OF PRE-PROCEDURE CT SCAN TO PREDICT SEVERE ESOPHAGEAL HEATING DURING HIGH POWER SHORT DURATION ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION

Abstract

The degree of esophageal heating during left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation is a powerful predictor of esophageal injury. Esophageal temperature monitoring has not been shown, however, to reduce esophageal injury risk related to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Esophageal proximity modeling based on pre-procedure CT scan using ADAS 3D software (ADAS3D Medical, Barcelona, Spain) is a novel method of identifying left atrial locations at high risk for severe esophageal heating. Given the mobile nature of the esophagus relative to the LAPW, the predictive value of esophageal proximity mapping is unclear. To determine the predictive value of esophageal proximity mapping to identify LAPW ablation sites at risk for severe esophageal heating. Pre-procedure CT scans were analyzed using ADAS 3D software in 10 patients undergoing AF ablation to create a 3D esophageal proximity model and left atrial tissue thickness map that were merged with a catheter based left atrial electroanatomic map (Ensite X, Abbott, Inc.). Esophageal proximity was defined as: Zone 1 – overlying esophagus, Zone 2 – within 5 mm of esophagus, or Zone 3 – > 5 mm from esophagus. LAPW ablation lesions were created with a contact-force sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter (Tacticath, Abbott, Inc.) at 45W, 10-20g of force, and 6 seconds duration. A 12 sensor esophageal temperature probe (Circa, Circa Scientific, Inc.) recorded the temperature increase related to each LAPW lesion. Ablation lesions in Zone 3 resulted in significantly lower esophageal temperature rise (degrees Celsius) as compared to either Zone 1 (mean 0.11 ± 0.27 vs 1.61 ± 1.39, p value <0.0001) or Zone 2 (mean 0.11 ± 0.27 vs 0.84 ± 1.1, p value <0.0001) (Fig A). Lesions in Zone 2 resulted in lower temperature rise as compared to Zone 1 (mean 0.84 ±1.1 vs. 1.61 ± 1.39, p value <0.0001) (Fig A). Within Zones 1 and 2, lesions with LAPW thickness > 2 mm resulted in significantly less esophageal temperature rise as compared to those on tissue with thickness of ≤ 2 mm (Fig B). Ablation lesions delivered >5mm from esophageal location at time of pre-procedure CT scan are very unlikely to result in significant esophageal heating. Ablation sites overlying esophagus with LAPW thickness ≤ 2mm were at greatest risk of significant esophageal heating. Analysis of pre-procedure CT scans to determine esophageal proximity and LAPW thickness may be useful in developing strategies to avoid esophageal injury during LAPW RF ablation.