Abstract

Abstract Aim Previous evidence suggests that some fields of cognitive function are man dominated while others are woman dominated. Recent research has additionally associated sexual orientation with cognitive function. However, data on the effect of sexual orientation on various cognitive subdomains are limited. We aim to explore the variability in a range of cognitive subdomains (working memory, language, attention, processing speed, and executive functioning) by cis-gender hetero versus homo sexual orientation. Methods We combined NHANES 2011–2012 and NHANES 2013–2014 datasets to study the individuals (60-69 years old) with both sexual health and cognitive assessment data. We analyzed the data to assess the performance of heterosexual and homosexual men and women on various cognitive function assessments. We used 1) word learning and recall modules from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) to examine new verbal learning, immediate and delayed memory; 2) the Animal Fluency test (AFT) to evaluate verbal sematic fluency and 3) the Digital Symbol Substitution test (DSST) to assess attention and processing speed. Mentally impaired individuals or participants who were unable to understand or read English, Spanish, Korean, Vietnamese, traditional or simplified Mandarin, or Cantonese were not asked questions regarding sexual orientation and hence, were excluded from final analysis. Simple Linear regression models were used to quantify the association of sexual orientation and cognitive function. Statistical significant was specified at P < 0.05. Results Our study population consists of 61 homosexual adults (39 men and 22 women) and 3087 heterosexual adults (1486 men and 1601 women). Comparison of heterosexual men and women demonstrated differences typically found between the genders, with heterosexual women performing significantly better on all cognitive function assessments. Homosexual men scored significantly higher than heterosexual men on all cognitive function assessments and performed in the direction of heterosexual women in all cognitive domains. In fact, mean scores for homosexual men were even higher than for heterosexual women in the four of the six cognitive domains tested (CERAD 2 and delayed recall, AFT and DSST). Homosexual women did not differ from heterosexual women and homosexual men on any of the measures of cognitive performance. Therefore, as expected, homosexual women scored higher points than heterosexual men on most cognitive assessments (CERAD 1,3 and delayed recall, and DSST). Conclusion Homosexual men were gender-atypical and performed in the direction of heterosexual women in cognitive domains related to working memory, language, attention, processing speed, and executive functioning. Homosexual women were sex-typical with cognitive skills similar to heterosexual women. These findings underscore the need for further studies to understand the association of sexual orientation with cognitive functioning. Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call