Abstract

The Lhunze region of southeast Tibet uniquely juxtaposes Cenozoic granitic plutons with subvolcanic rocks in the Tethyan Himalayan Sequence. In this study, the potential petrogenetic connection between two-mica granite and subvolcanic rhyolite porphyry from the Lhunze area is investigated using petrology, geochronology, and geochemistry. Monazite Th Pb ages imply the two-mica granite crystallized during the mid-Eocene at c. 43.5–43.1 Ma, consistent with previous zircon U Pb isotope data. Monazite in the porphyry also records Th Pb ages of c. 44.5–42.9 Ma , suggesting contemporaneous emplacement with the two-mica granite. Porphyritic structure, feldspar aggregates and comb alignment demonstrate that the two-mica granite resulted from transient melt flow associated with melt extraction. Some plagioclase phenocrysts from the porphyry have consistent An contents with the two-mica granite, indicating that both the two-mica granite and the porphyry probably originated from a similar melt. However, the porphyry has a higher SiO 2 concentration (72.2–75.9 wt%) than the two-mica granite (69.0–73.0 wt%). In addition, the porphyry is characterized by lower TiO 2 , MgO, CaO, Ba, Sr, and Zr contents as well as Zr/Hf, Sr/Y, Nb/Ta ratios than the two-mica granite. Moreover, strontium and REE contents of monazite in both the two-mica granite and porphyry also imply that crystal fractionation dominated melt evolution. Whole-rock Sr Nd and in situ monazite Nd isotope compositions indicate that the porphyry is slightly more radiogenic than the two-mica granite, implying that the porphyry likely assimilated more ancient country rocks during its evolution. We interpret the two-mica granite and porphyry as comagmatic intrusives linked by fractional crystallization of a cognate magma mush, in which the crystals accumulated to form the two-mica granite, and the complementary high silicic melt segregated to form the porphyry. Plagioclase accumulation is responsible for the generation of the high Sr /Y adakitic geochemical feather within two-mica granite. The scenario of complementary melt extraction and crystal fractionation might also have been an important process in forming the Himalayan leucogranites. Regionally, Neo-Tethyan slab breakoff during the Eocene could have increased mantle heat flow and triggered the generation and extraction of large volumes of silicic melt. • Two-mica granite and subvolcanic rhyolite porphyry have a coeval crystallization age at 44–43 Ma . • Two-mica granite represents cumulate and the porphyry as its complementary highly fractionated melt. • Magma differentiation via melt extraction from crystal mush is an effective mechanism to produce Himalayan leucogranites.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call