Abstract
Something of moral foundation of Pluralism that is practiced in everyday life is captured in series of interview responses and commentary. The commentary on reported interviews speaks of Self as the primary, given, reality in interviewees' worldview, and of its evaluation as human and sacred, and describes it as the basis of a solidarity. Two experiences lay behind conceptualization of religion at end of 1960s. Intensive concerns with extensive effects give equal balance to both focal points and to hinterland being integrated. Thus it declines to call religious occasional acclamation of a football team (or of a preacher), however passionate it may be, unless it epitomizes and/or affects personal or social life outside that hour of exposure. Keywords: commentary; implicit religion; pluralism; solidarity
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
