Abstract
Contemporary and market-based conservation policies, constructed as rational, neutral and apolitical, are being pursued around the world in the aim of staving off multiple, unfolding and overlapping environmental crises. However, the substantial body of research that examines the dominance of neoliberal environmental policies has paid relatively little attention to how colonial legacies interact with these contemporary and market-based conservation policies enacted in the Global South. It is only recently that critical scholars have begun to demonstrate how colonial legacies interact with market-based conservation policies in ways that increase their risk of failure, deepen on-the-ground inequalities and cement global injustices. In this article, we take further this emerging body of work by showing how contemporary,market-based conservation initiatives extend the temporalities and geographies of colonialism, undergird long-standing hegemonies and perpetuate exploitative power relations in the governing of nature-society relations, particularly in the Global South. Reflecting on ethnographic insights from six different field sites across countries of the Global South, we argue that decolonization is an important and necessary step in confronting some of the major weaknesses of contemporary conservation and the wider socio-ecological crisis itself. We conclude by briefly outlining what decolonizing conservation might entail.
Highlights
Contemporary and market-based conservation policies, often constructed as rational, neutral and apolitical, are being pursued around the world with the aim of staving off multiple, unfolding and overlapping environmental crises
The substantial body of research that examines the dominance of neoliberal environmental policies has paid relatively little attention to how colonial legacies interact with these policies
There is a tendency in neoliberal conservation to privilege novelties and discontinuities, with much analysis framed around the question of 'what is new?' in relation to neoliberal environmental governance and the green economy (Boyd et al, 2011: 601; Fairhead et al, 2012: 239; Corson and McDonald, 2012: 264)
Summary
Contemporary and market-based conservation policies, often constructed as rational, neutral and apolitical, are being pursued around the world with the aim of staving off multiple, unfolding and overlapping environmental crises. The substantial body of research that examines the dominance of neoliberal environmental policies has paid relatively little attention to how colonial legacies interact with these policies. There is a tendency in neoliberal conservation to privilege novelties and discontinuities, with much analysis framed around the question of 'what is new?' in relation to neoliberal environmental governance and the green economy (Boyd et al, 2011: 601; Fairhead et al, 2012: 239; Corson and McDonald, 2012: 264). Kashwan et al (2021) recently traced the persistence of colonial legacy and racialized power relations across recent conservation approaches including the market-based approach, explicitly calling for decolonized, inclusive and regenerative approaches to conservation. Taking further earlier indications of racial and neocolonial undercurrents in carbon offsetting
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.