Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine whether and, if so, how far, the Augustinian notion of malum is related to Plotinus’ concept of evil, as it appears in Ennead I. 8 [51]. The Augustinian notion of evil will be analyzed by focusing on the De natura boni, considering plurality and unity in Augustine’s identification of malum and nihil, both in their ontological and axiological dimensions. Topics selected for special consideration will be, first, evil as lack of modus, species and ordo naturalis (De nat. b., 4), and, secondly, corruptio as cause of defectio boni (De nat. b., 6). The second part will analyze Plotinus’ notion of evil, as spelled out in Ennead I, 8 [51], considering the Plotinian identity of to kakon and me on. Topics selected for analysis will be, first, the concept of evil as lack of measure, form and order (Enn. I. 8. 3), and secondly, the notion of to kakon as lack of good (Enn. I. 8. 5) simpliciter. The third part of this paper will consider the differences between Augustine’s and Plotinus’ identity of evil and non-being, as related to the notion of matter. Topics selected for analysis will be, firstly, Plotinus’ identity of matter and evil (Enn. I. 8. 10), and, secondly, Augustine’s concept of matter as capacitas formarum (De nat. b., 18). The conclusion will bring out how Plotinus’ concept of steresis suggests both a different relation between evil and non-being while being closely resembling Augustine’s pattern of malum and nihil.
Highlights
The aim of this paper is to examine Augustine’s reflections concerning the concept of evil, in order to identify whether – and to what extent – Augustine’s notion of malum is related to Plotinus’ concept of evil
By looking at the concepts of evil that emerge from Augustine and Plotinus, it will examine the notions of non-being and matter as they are exposed in Ennead I. 8 and in De Natura Boni
In the light of this analysis we can conclude that Plotinus’ and Augustine’s identification of evil and of the non-being initially displays a total correspondence between the elements of their patterns
Summary
The aim of this paper is to examine Augustine’s reflections concerning the concept of evil, in order to identify whether – and to what extent – Augustine’s notion of malum is related to Plotinus’ concept of evil. This will be done by examining the Augustinian and Plotinian identification of evil and non-being as it appears in Ennead I. This paper will demonstrate that Plotinus’ notion of evil as steresis is akin to Augustine’s concept of evil as defectus boni, confirming the theoretical relationship between Augustine’s and Plotinus’ idea of evil.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
