Abstract

Early Pliocene suids of Europe are generally rare and poorly preserved, but some exceptional fossils have been found at Roussillon, France, Villafranca d'Asti, Italy, and Kvabebi, Georgia. We here describe and interpret an almost complete skull of a small suid from Musaitu and a mandible fragment from Dermenji, Moldova, which add precious information to the data base concerning these small European Pliocene suids, here attributed to Dasychoerus arvernensis (Croizet & Jobert, 1828). The Moldovan fossils provide an important biogeographic link between the Western European and Asian Plio-Pleistocene suines. The Musaitu skull, in particular, shows the elongated snout, enlarged canine flanges, pneumatised zygomatic arch and low slung incisor row characteristic of the genus Dasychoerus Gray, 1873. This species is important because it represents the group from which the African Kolpochoerus Van Hoepen & Van Hoepen, 1932 lineage probably emerged. The latter group is useful for biochronology because, having arrived in Africa, where it has been called Kolpochoerus deheinzelini Brunet & White, 2001 (in fact a junior synonym of Dasychoerus arvernensis) it evolved rapidly in dimensions and dental morphology. During the Pliocene the genus Dasychoerus, already adapted to tropical and subtropical climates, was widespread in mid-latitude Eurasia and Africa, but when much of mid-latitude Eurasia became boreal during the Plio-Pleistocene, the range of Dasy­ choerus shrank equatorwards, giving way to boreally adapted Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 over much of its former territory, leaving a disjunct distribution of its descendants in Africa (Hylochoerus Thomas, 1904, possibly Potamochoerus Gray, 1854) and the tropical islands of the Far East (Dasychoerus).

Highlights

  • For well over a century, the origins of the African Plio-Pleistocene suid lineages remained obscure, with various authors either proposing that they emerged from a “hypothetical Sus-like ancestor” (Cooke & Wilkinson 1978) or not attempting to propose an ancestor, a history summarised by Pickford (2012, 2013a)

  • Pickford (2012) observed that the most primitive described species of Kolpochoerus Van Hoepen & Van Hoepen, 1932 (K. deheinzelini Brunet & White, 2001) is morphometrically so close to the type material of Dasychoerus arvernensis (Croizet & Jobert, 1828) and other European specimens attributed to this taxon, that the African form should be transferred to this species

  • Origin of the Kolpochoerus lineage Wherever its ultimate centre of origin is determined to have been (the Far East? – similar species are known from Java (Hardjasasmita 1987), Myanmar (Pickford 2013b) and China (Han 1987; Pickford 2013b), as well as the Siwaliks of Indo-Pakistan (Pickford 1988) – Dasychoerus arvernensis was in the right place at the right time to spread to Africa (Fig. 24) whereupon it gave rise to the Kolpochoerus and subsequently to the Hylochoerus lineage (Pickford 2013a, d) and possibly to Potamochoerus as well, an old idea (Cooke 1978; Bishop 2010), resurrected by Souron et al (2013)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

For well over a century, the origins of the African Plio-Pleistocene suid lineages remained obscure, with various authors either proposing that they emerged from a “hypothetical Sus-like ancestor” (Cooke & Wilkinson 1978) or not attempting to propose an ancestor, a history summarised by Pickford (2012, 2013a). During the Pliocene and early Pleistocene, within the confines of Europe, Dasychoerus arvernensis underwent evolution notably in dimensions, culminating in the large suine Dasy­ choerus strozzii (Meneghini, 1862) (Forsyth-Major 1881) It is not beyond the realms of possibility that Dasychoerus Gray, 1873, could be the group from which the genus Potamo­ choerus Gray, 1854, descended – fossils of Kolpochoerus and Dasychoerus have on occasion been attributed to Potamo­choerus (Cooke 1978; Arribas & Garrido 2008; Bishop 2010). Pliocene suids from Moldova: understanding the origin of African Kolpochoerus et al (2013) indicated that Potamochoerus was the sister group of Kolpochoerus + Hylochoerus, with Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 more distantly related These authors classified the species K. afarensis in Potamochoerus, a suggestion that echoes back to the identifications of Cooke (1978) and Bishop (2010). The origin of the species “Sus” provincialis Blainville, 1847 (Gervais 1850) probably predated the radiative process of Dasychoerus-Kolpochoerus, and it may have given rise to what in Africa are known as metridiochoeres and phacochoeres (Pickford 2012, 2013d)

MATERIAL AND METHODS
35 Length upper teeth
35 Length lower teeth
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call