Abstract

Fractional-order control system design can be used for systems with non-local dynamics involving long-term memory effects. However, implementation of a fractional-order controller in industrial systems is complicated, because of the excessive demand for computational power. The following paper presents the step-by-step design procedure, parameter tuning, and experimental evaluation of the fractional order proportional-integral-derivative (FOPID) controller. The control algorithm is based on the Continued Fraction Expansion approximation of the fractional-order operators. It is implemented on a standard industrial Programmable Logic Controller. The FOPID control system is verified and evaluated in terms of efficiency and robustness using a new laboratory benchmark of a temperature control in the pipeline. The proposed solution shows increased efficiency in terms of robustness compared to the standard PID closed-loop control.

Highlights

  • The Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) algorithm is one of the most used algorithms in the industry to control processes

  • Most of the processes associated with complex systems have non-local dynamics involving long-term memory effects

  • The major problem with control engineering applications of fractional calculus was the complicated method of solving the differential equations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) algorithm is one of the most used algorithms in the industry to control processes. The major problem with control engineering applications of fractional calculus was the complicated method of solving the differential equations It was overcome with finding the proper geometric and physical interpretation of the fractional operators [56] and their efficient numerical approximations, like Power Series Expansion (PSE) [54] or Continued Fraction Expansion (CFE) [7], among others. Implementations of fractional operators based on CFE approximation using SIEMENS S7-1200 PLC are presented in [42], and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) experiments are described in [43]. This article synthesizes the mentioned works and describes the step-by-step design procedure, parameter tuning, and implementation of the PIkDl algorithm with CFE approximation on a laboratory test stand.

Differ-integral operator
Cðm À aÞ dm dtm
Oustaloup approximation of differ-integral operator
Discrete approximation of differ-integral
Description of laboratory test stand
Process identification
Tuning of the controller
Phase 1: simulink implementation
Quality indices
Selection of the sampling period
Simulations
Laboratory tests
TIPID s þ
Discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.