Abstract
This paper discusses the complex and complicit financial arrangements enabling the construction of a stadium for the Rugby World Cup. It investigates how costs and debt can be deliberately obscured, blurred and otherwise conflated within the disaggregated structures of contemporary local government. More particularly, we draw comparisons with the ‘shell game’ (a type of swindle involving three cups or shells and a pea). We trace the historical context in which governments have been encouraged to become entrepreneurial, resulting in the mixed ownership models of holding companies. We argue that this model of governance enabled the shifting of costs and debt such that the project could be made palatable to both councillors and citizens. However, the complexity of this design is such that it would be virtually impossible to analyse, interpret and debate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.