Abstract

Mark-recapture models are extensively used in quantitative population ecology, providing estimates of population vital rates, such as survival, that are difficult to obtain using other methods. Vital rates are commonly modeled as functions of explanatory covariates, adding considerable flexibility to mark-recapture models, but also increasing the subjectivity and complexity of the modeling process. Consequently, model selection and the evaluation of covariate structure remain critical aspects of mark-recapture modeling. The difficulties involved in model selection are compounded in Cormack-Jolly-Seber models because they are composed of separate sub-models for survival and recapture probabilities, which are conceptualized independently even though their parameters are not statistically independent. The construction of models as combinations of sub-models, together with multiple potential covariates, can lead to a large model set. Although desirable, estimation of the parameters of all models may not be feasible. Strategies to search a model space and base inference on a subset of all models exist and enjoy widespread use. However, even though the methods used to search a model space can be expected to influence parameter estimation, the assessment of covariate importance, and therefore the ecological interpretation of the modeling results, the performance of these strategies has received limited investigation. We present a new strategy for searching the space of a candidate set of Cormack-Jolly-Seber models and explore its performance relative to existing strategies using computer simulation. The new strategy provides an improved assessment of the importance of covariates and covariate combinations used to model survival and recapture probabilities, while requiring only a modest increase in the number of models on which inference is based in comparison to existing techniques.

Highlights

  • Mark-recapture models are among the most widely utilized classes of models in quantitative population ecology

  • The results reveal that the plausible combinations (PC) strategy closely mimics the performance of the all combinations (AC) strategy and provides an unbiased assessment of covariate structure, with only a modest increase in the average number of models evaluated compared to the p- and φ-first strategies

  • None of the strategies resulted in parameter estimates with a mean relative sum of squares (RSS) that approached that of the single model with the smallest RSS, indicating that for each set of capture histories there was usually at least one model among all 256 models with parameter estimates closer to the true values than either the minimum AICC model, and closer than the model-averaged estimates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mark-recapture models are among the most widely utilized classes of models in quantitative population ecology. Mark-recapture models were primarily used to estimate abundance [1,2] and survival rates [3,4]. The diversity and complexity of these models have advanced rapidly in recent years, and modern mark-recapture models are commonly utilized to estimate a variety of vital rates and parameters related to processes such as immigration, state transition, and geographic transience [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. The use of covariates substantially enhances the value of mark-recapture models for ecological investigation by providing a mechanism for both generating and testing hypotheses regarding linkages between population vital rates and characteristics of individual animals and their environments. Most mark-recapture experiments are not explicitly designed to test specific hypotheses, but rather generate observational data that may be used to investigate relationships and formulate hypotheses through

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.