Abstract

The extent of self-predication in the earlier dialogues self-predication in the Hippias Major and the Protagoras the third man the middle-dialogue forms are universals the rejection of the doctrine that the form is not an F Thing the form as an F Thing non-univocally with the F Particulars the form as an F Thing univocally with the F Particulars logico-linguistic error as the genesis of the paradigm case three more likely sources for the paradigm case the failure to distinguish the universal from the paradigm case.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call