Platinum/taxane/pembrolizumab vs platinum/5FU/pembrolizumab in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/m HNSCC)

Abstract

ObjectivesPembrolizumab +/− chemotherapy is standard therapy for r/m HNSCC. Despite regulatory approval of platinum/5FU/pembrolizumab, a taxane is often substituted for 5FU for convenience and tolerability. We aimed to characterize nationwide use patterns and compare outcomes between platinum/taxane/pembrolizumab vs platinum/5FU/pembrolizumab. MethodsPatients in a US nationwide database with r/m HNSCC treated from 2017 to 2022 with pembrolizumab plus platinum chemotherapy were included. Demographic and cancer-specific characteristics were summarized. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and compared between groups using log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression. Time on treatment, number of cycles, receipt of second-line therapy, and toxicities were compared between groups. ResultsOf 438 patients, 320 (73 %) received 5FU and 118 (27 %) received a taxane. Taxane use became more frequent over time and was higher in academic vs community practices (51 % vs 23 %, p < 0.001). OS did not differ between taxane and 5FU groups (mOS 12.2 vs 13.4 months, p = 0.662). On multivariable Cox regression, HR for death associated with taxane vs 5FU was 0.99 (95 %CI 0.71–1.38). Receipt of 2L therapy was numerically higher for 5FU patients (46 %) compared to taxane patients (35 %, p = 0.071). Grade ≥ 3 anemia was more common in taxane patients (33 % vs 20 %, p = 0.003), whereas grade ≥ 3 lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia were numerically higher in 5FU patients. ConclusionIn patients with r/m HNSCC undergoing chemoimmunotherapy, taxane vs 5FU use varies by practice setting and geographical region. Platinum/taxane/pembrolizumab was associated with similar survival as platinum/5FU/pembrolizumab; these results suggest that chemoimmunotherapy with taxane is a reasonable alternative to 5FU.