Abstract
Recent scholarship on smart cities and platform urbanism has explored the very wide range of data harvested from urban environments by digital devices of many kinds, analysing how not only efficiencies but also profits are sought through the extraction, circulation, transformation, commodification, integration, and re‐use of data. Much of that data is generated by smartphone applications. This paper looks at the design of a group of eight smartphone apps by a range of different actors in Milton Keynes, a small UK city with a large number of smart city initiatives. The apps are understood as a co‐constitutive interface between data circulations and embodied users. The paper focuses specifically on the data that the apps generated and shared and on how the app designers anticipated that the data would create different kinds of value for embodied app users. While some data circulations were understood as ways of generating financial value, the paper argues that a number of other forms of value were assumed in the app design. The paper identifies two of these, which it terms normative values and interactive values. It examines how the data mobilised by the smart city apps enacts particular versions of these values, and how those values co‐constitute specific kinds of bodies, agencies, and geographies in digitally mediated cities.
Highlights
It is clear that in many parts of the world, much of urban life is digitally mediated
This paper suggests that other geographies are rendered as data circulations enact value
The plan by Motion Map's developers to charge a fee for the use of the app to bus companies and drivers makes money only from travelling bodies, and the value of user data to MyMK Heritage was the bodies it had induced into movement and health
Summary
It is clear that in many parts of the world, much of urban life is digitally mediated. This paper too assumes that data circulations can enact different kinds of values In their feminist accounts of platforms, Leszczynski (2019b) and Barns (2020) are both alert to the imbrication of app interfaces with forms of embodiment. Critical work on the co‐production of bodies with big digital data has focused on both the “back end” algorithmic reproduction of racialised and gendered bodies (Eubanks, 2017; Jefferson, 2017; Leszczynski & Elwood, 2015; Noble, 2018) and on the “front end” of everyday co‐ production of embodiment with smartphone apps (Bonner‐Thompson, 2017; Miles, 2017) In both cases, it is clear that the aggregation and analysis of specific data co‐constitutes different kinds of embodiment. The section discusses the paper's case study
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
