Abstract

Despite encouraging results reported with regards to Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) application in osteoarthritis (OA) knee, still critical issues like conclusive structural evidence of its efficacy, standard dose and good manual method of preparation to obtain high yield remains unanswered. Present study is an attempt to optimise the dose and concentration of therapeutic PRP and its correlation with structural, physiologic efficacy with a new manual method of PRP preparation. A total of one hundred and fifty patients were randomized to receive either PRP (10 billion platelets) or hyaluronic acid (HA; 4 ml; 75 patients in each group) and followed up till 1 year. An addition of filtration step with 1 µm filter in manual PRP processing improved platelet recovery upto 90%. Significant improvements in WOMAC (51.94 ± 7.35 vs. 57.33 ± 8.92; P < 0.001), IKDC scores (62.8 ± 6.24 vs 52.7 ± 6.39; P < 0.001), 6-min pain free walking distance (+ 120 vs. + 4; P < 0.001) persisted in PRP compared to HA group at 1 year. Significant decline IL-6 and TNF-α levels observed in PRP group (P < 0.05) compared to HA at 1 month. Study demonstrated that an absolute count of 10 billion platelets is crucial in a PRP formulation to have long sustained chondroprotective effect upto one year in moderate knee OA.

Highlights

  • Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of severe long-term pain and disability affecting approximately 10% of the global ­population[1]

  • There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the groups (Table1)

  • Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been extensively explored as a chondro-protective treatment for symptomatic knee ­OA8

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of severe long-term pain and disability affecting approximately 10% of the global ­population[1]. The research for treatment of knee OA with PRP is p­ romising[4,5,6], there is a lack of consensus regarding the preparation of standardized dosing with an appropriate absolute number of platelets and concentration. Most manual methods fail to provide a high yield and often have variable concentrations ranging two to four times of physiological c­ ount[7]. In order to have a high consistent platelet yield we designed a filtration-based manual method. This prospective randomized controlled study was primarily aimed at standardizing the ideal PRP dosage and concentration, and to assess the subjective, structural and physiological efficacy of PRP in OA knee

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call