Plate versus sacroiliac screw fixation for treating posterior pelvic ring fracture: a Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BackgroundWhether plate fixation or sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation is the better treatment for posterior pelvic ring disruption is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the two fixation methods. Material and methodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies comparing plate and SI screw fixations in posterior pelvic ring injuries. Intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and clinical/radiological scores were compared between the techniques. ResultsEleven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and nine in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 202 patients who underwent plate fixation and 258 patients who underwent SI screw fixation. The incision length and mean blood loss were greater in the plate group than in the SI screw group (standard mean difference (SMD) = 7.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.18-11.40; SMD = 5.09, 95% CI: 2.08-8.09, respectively). Patients in the SI screw group had more X-ray exposure than those in the plate group (SMD = -5.96, 95% CI: -7.95–3.97). There were no differences in operation time and intraoperative complications (SMD = -1.42, 95% CI: -3.90-1.05; OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.05–18.60, respectively). The duration of hospital stay was longer in the plate group (SMD = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.74-2.68). There were no differences in postoperative neurological complications, infection rate, and nonunion rate (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 0.20–13.21; OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 0.74–5.94; OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.26–4.87, respectively), but implant loosening was more common in the SI screw group (OR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04–0.87). There was no difference in revision surgery (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.02–2.14). The total excellent rating according to the postoperative Majeed functional and Matta scores was higher in the SI screw group (OR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.91; OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.74, respectively). ConclusionsSI screw fixation was superior to plate fixation in the functional and radiological scores, but implant loosening was more common for the treatment posterior pelvic ring injuries.