Abstract
Abstract The ‘modern revolution’ in the Earth sciences is associated with the emergence of plate tectonics in the late 1960s. The assumption that the crust of the Earth was composed of a small number of rigid, non-deformable, mobile plates enabled a quantitative, kinematic description of current geological processes and reconstructions of past plate interactions. The simple model of plate theory c. 1970, for example its depiction of a subduction zone, has since undergone considerable refinement. However, some geologists, especially those concerned with questions of continental tectonics, contend that plate theory in its current form is of limited value in addressing questions of continental tectonics, and prefer to employ the concept of allochthonous terranes in characterizing, describing and interpreting regional geology. These geologists may understandably take the view that plate tectonics is a kinematic grand generalization but thus far not particularly useful in making sense of the rocks at the local level.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.