Plate fixation in periprosthetic femur fractures Vancouver type B1—Trochanteric hook plate or subtrochanterical bicortical locking?

Abstract

IntroductionProximal plate fixation in periprosthetic femur fractures can be improved by plate anchorage in the greater trochanter (lateral tension band principle) or bicortical locking screw placement beside the prosthesis stem in an embracement configuration. Both concepts were compared in a biomechanical test using a femoral hook plate (hook) or a locking attachment plate (LAP). MethodsAfter bone mineral density (BMD) measurement in the greater trochanter, six pairs of fresh frozen human femora were assigned to two groups and instrumented with cemented hip endoprostheses. A transverse osteotomy was set distal to the tip of the prosthesis, simulating a Vancouver B1 fracture. Each pair was instrumented using a plate tensioner with either hook or LAP construct. Cyclic testing (2Hz) with physiologic profile and monotonically increasing load was performed until catastrophic failure. Plate stiffness was compared in a four-point-bending-test. Paired student’s-t-test was used for statistical evaluation (p<0.05). ResultsMean BMD was 250mgHA/ccm±47. The hook construct exhibited a significantly (p=0.015) lower number of cycles and load to failure (26′177cycles±2777; 3′118N±778) correlating significantly with BMD (R2=0.83; p=0.04) compared to the LAP construct (37′423cycles±5′299; 4′242N±1′030) (R2=0.71;p=0.11). BMD was a significant covariate (p=0.01). Plate stiffness was in a comparable range (hook Plate 468N/mm±7; LCP 445N/mm±6). ConclusionSubtrochanterically placed LAP provides an increased fixation strength under repetitive loading compared to hook plate fixation in the greater trochanter. Trochanteric fixation is highly BMD dependent and may be restricted to major greater trochanteric involvement requiring stabilization.