Abstract

AbstractThe development of a methylolacrylamide–styrene copolymer into a product suitable for use as a general‐purpose industrial or appliance enamel has been described; the choice of a suitable means of plasticization is emphasized. The incorporation of ethyl acrylate in the copolymer is expensive and was found relatively inefficient. Plasticization by blending the copolymer with tricresyl phosphate, butyl cyclohexyl phthalate, or dioctyl phthalate gave excessive thermoplasticity. Attempted plasticization by blending the copolymer with conformationally different macromolecules failed owing to incompatibility; this was overcome by reacting the macromolecules with the acrylic copolymer instead of blending: First, a butyl alcohol modified methylolacrylamide–styrene copolymer was transetherified with cetyl alcohol and in a second synthesis, transetherified with coconut oil monoglyceride. Third, an acrylamide–styrene–acrylic acid copolymer was esterified by the same monoglyceride, methylolated, and then butylated. Finally, an acrylamide–styrene copolymer was copolymerized and grafted onto a styrene–butadiene copolymer. This latter type of plasticization, which should be a general and valuable method, was supplemented by plasticization from dioctyl phthalate and yielded, after heating, economical and durable films with good mechanical properties.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.