Abstract

Tadpoles can respond to perceived predation risk by adjusting their life history, morphology, and behavior in an adaptive way. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity can evolve by natural selection only if there is variation in reaction norms and if this variation is, at least in part, heritable. To provide insights into the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity, we analyzed the environmental and parental components of variation in predator-induced life history (age and size at metamorphosis), morphology (tail depth), and behavior of Italian treefrog tadpoles (Hyla intermedia). Using an incomplete factorial design, we raised tadpoles either with or without caged predators (dragonfly larvae, gen. Aeshna) and, successively, we tested them in experimental arenas either with or without caged predators. Results provided strong evidence for an environmental effect on all three sets of characters. Tadpoles raised with caged predators (dragonfly larvae, gen. Aeshna) metamorphosed earlier (but at a similar body size) and developed deeper tails than their fullsib siblings raised without predators. In the experimental arenas, all tadpoles, independent of their experience, flexibly changed their activity and position, depending on whether the cage was empty or contained the predator. Tadpoles of the two experimental groups, however, showed different responses: those raised with predators were always less active than their predator-naive siblings and differences slightly increased in the presence of predators. Besides this strong environmental component of phenotypic variation, results provided evidence also for parental and parental-by-environment effects, which were strong on life-history, but weak on morphology and behavior. Interestingly, additive parental effects were explained mainly by dams. This supports the hypothesis that phenotypic plasticity might mainly depend on maternal effects and that it might be the expression of condition-dependent mechanisms.Significance statementAnimals, by plastically adjusting their phenotypes to the local environments, can often sensibly improve their chances of survival, suggesting the hypothesis that phenotypic plasticity evolved by natural selection. We test this hypothesis in the Italian treefrog tadpoles, by investigating the heritable variation in the plastic response to predators (dragonfly larvae). Using an incomplete factorial common-garden experiment, we showed that tadpoles raised with predators metamorphosed earlier (but at similar body size), developed deeper tails, and were less active than their siblings raised without predators. The plastic response varied among families, but variation showed a stronger maternal than paternal component. This suggests that plasticity might largely depend on epigenetic factors and be the expression of condition-dependent mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Organisms live in environments that vary, often unpredictably, both in time and space

  • Using an incomplete factorial common-garden experiment, we showed that tadpoles raised with predators metamorphosed earlier, developed deeper tails, and were less active than their siblings raised without predators

  • Predation is an important selective mechanism driving adaptive evolution. Since predation varies both in time and space, natural selection has favored the evolution of mechanisms that allow prey to perceive and to respond effectively to the current risk they face

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Organisms live in environments that vary, often unpredictably, both in time and space. A classic case of adaptive phenotypic plasticity is the antipredator defenses developed by prey after exposure to predator cues (Agrawal 2001; Benard 2004): for example, in the presence of predators, water fleas (Daphnia sp.) develop sharp helmets and long tail spines (Dodson 1988), mussels increase shell thickness and abductor muscles (Leonard et al 1999), and anuran tadpoles develop deeper tails (Relyea 2001a). The above-mentioned changes in the morphology of water fleas, mussels, and tadpoles are examples of this category of plastic traits. Phenotypic flexibility, in contrast, involves morphological and behavioral traits that can be reversibly changed over shorter timescales to cope with the local and ephemeral conditions of the environment (Piersma and Drent 2003). Under high predator risks, prey increase vigilance and reduce feeding activity (Ferrari et al 2009), they change spatial distribution favoring aggregations and social interactions (Kimbell and Morrell 2015), and modify several aspects of their breeding behavior (Lima 2009)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call