Abstract

The tendency for flower longevity to increase with altitude is believed by many alpine ecologists to play an important role in compensating for low pollination rates at high altitudes due to cold and variable weather conditions. However, current studies documenting an altitudinal increase in flower longevity in the alpine habitat derive principally from studies on open-pollinated flowers where lower pollinator visitation rates at higher altitudes will tend to lead to flower senescence later in the life-span of a flower in comparison with lower altitudes, and thus could confound the real altitudinal pattern in a species´ potential flower longevity. In a two-year study we tested the hypothesis that a plastic effect of temperature on flower longevity could contribute to an altitudinal increase in potential flower longevity measured in pollinator-excluded flowers in high Andean Rhodolirium montanum Phil. (Amaryllidaceae). Using supplemental warming we investigated whether temperature around flowers plastically affects potential flower longevity. We determined tightly temperature-controlled potential flower longevity and flower height for natural populations on three alpine sites spread over an altitudinal transect from 2350 and 3075 m a.s.l. An experimental increase of 3.1°C around flowers significantly decreased flower longevity indicating a plastic response of flowers to temperature. Flower height in natural populations decreased significantly with altitude. Although temperature negatively affects flower longevity under experimental conditions, we found no evidence that temperature around flowers explains site variation in flower longevity over the altitudinal gradient. In a wetter year, despite a 3.5°C temperature difference around flowers at the extremes of the altitudinal range, flower longevity showed no increase with altitude. However, in a drier year, flower longevity increased significantly with altitude. The emerging picture suggests an increase in flower longevity along the altitudinal gradient is less common for potential flower longevity than for open-pollination flower longevity. Independently of any selection that may occur on potential longevity, plastic responses of flowers to environmental conditions are likely to contribute to altitudinal variation in flower longevity, especially in dry alpine areas. Such plastic responses could push flowers of alpine species towards shorter life-lengths under climate change, with uncertain consequences for successful pollination and plant fitness in a warming world.

Highlights

  • Altitudinal gradients show two striking global trends related to plant reproduction

  • Plasticity in Flower Longevity in Alpine Rhodolirium montanum difference of 3.1 ̊C in mean temperatures experienced by the control and warmed flowers led to an estimated decrease in flower longevity of 1.2 ± 0.2 days, providing a flower longevity rate of change of -0.387 daysC-1

  • There is no evidence that natural variation in potential flower longevity across the altitudinal gradient is a direct product of temperature around flowers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Altitudinal gradients show two striking global trends related to plant reproduction. First, pollination rates decline with decreasing temperatures and more unpredictable weather conditions at higher altitudes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Flower longevity often increases with altitude [5,6,12,13,14,15,16,17], there being outstanding cases of nival plants with extremely long-lived stigmas [18,19]. The above two trends are considered to be functionally linked, with longer-lived flowers compensating for lower pollination rates at higher elevations [5,6,13]. Flowers that have the capacity to stay open for long periods of time in general allow more time for pollinator visits to accumulate [20,21] and can increase the probability of successful pollination when pollinator availability reaches a critical threshold. Physiological costs associated with transpiration, respiration and nectar production in flowers can drain resources for later fruit and seed set [22,23] and place limits on flower longevity, such that pollinator availability in natural populations is not the only factor molding flower longevity

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call