Abstract

Plane strain compression in a channel die is kinematically very similar to drawing; however, the possibility of void formation is limited due to a compressive component of stress. In drawing, voids were detected by small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and density measurements in poly(methylene oxide) (POM), polypropylene (PP), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE), but no voiding was found in polyamide 6 (PA 6), low-density polyethylenes (LDPEs), and ethylene−octene copolymer (EOC). The slope and shape of the initial elastic part of true stress−true strain curves are similar in tension and in channel die compression. When drawn samples of POM, PP, HDPE, and PA 6 already show yielding, the channel die compressed samples still undergo elastic deformation to a much larger deformation and respond with a much larger stress. Channel die compressed POM, PP, HDPE, and PA 6 exhibit strong and rapid strain hardening up to 400 MPa in contrast to their behavior in tension. The difference in strain hardening is related ...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call