Abstract

Bio-inspired self-similar hierarchical honeycombs are multifunctional cellular topologies used for resisting various loadings. However, the crushing behavior under large plastic deformation is still unknown. This paper investigates the in-plane compressive response of selective laser melting (SLM) fabricated hierarchical honeycombs. The effects of hierarchical order, relative density as well as constituent material are evaluated. The results show that at small deformation, the AlSi10Mg alloy hierarchical honeycombs show great advantages over the elastic modulus and compressive strength than 316L steel hierarchical honeycombs. As the relative density and hierarchical order increase, the failure mechanism of AlSi10Mg alloy honeycombs gradually changes from a bending-dominated mode to a fracture-dominated mode; whereas all the 316L steel honeycombs fail due to the distortion of original unit cells. At large deformation, the AlSi10Mg alloy honeycombs behave with brittle responses, while the 316L steel honeycombs exhibit ductile responses, showing a negative Poisson’s ratio behavior and gradient deformation of hierarchical unit cells. The addition of unit cell refinements improves the elastic modulus of AlSi10Mg alloy honeycombs and advances the densification of 316L steel honeycombs. In addition, the effect of constituent material on the compressive response of hierarchical honeycombs has been discussed. This study facilitates the development and future potential application of multifunctional ultra-light sandwich structures.

Highlights

  • A vast majority of man-made engineering items are inspired by prototypes in nature

  • The hierarchical honeycombs made from AlSi10Mg alloy possess higher in-plane elastic modulus than normal order honeycomb, whereas they do not exhibit advantages in the compressive strength for the specific geometric parameters; the hierarchical honeycombs made from 316L steel exhibit lower compressive strength and there is only negligible elastic modulus enhancement with the increasing hierarchical order

  • The AlSi10Mg alloy honeycombs experience a failure mode transition from cell wall bending dominated to cell wall fracture dominated when the relative density and hierarchical order increase, while the 316L steel honeycombs fail with distortion of unit cells, followed by the cell wall bending

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A vast majority of man-made engineering items are inspired by prototypes in nature. A most typical example of this is the periodic honeycombs which are motivated by macro honeybee combs. 1a, bio-inspired self-similar hierarchical honeycomb w conventional honeycomb has recently emerged via re with a smaller hexagonal unit cell, and higher hiera means of iteration [16]. Oftadeh et al topology [18] indic than conventional honeycomb has recently emerged via replacing the three-edged node first second-order hierarchical honeycombs joint withand a smaller hexagonal unit cell, and higher hierarchical orders can be obtained byare 2 means of iteration [16]. It is known that the in-plane honeycomb topolo plastic deformation of parent material at weak band increases the number of wall joints, contributing to than traditional honeycombs [21]. Materials 2021, 14, 5040 orders and the constituent material on the mechanical responses as well as energy absorption capacity is of great importance to advance the application of hierarchical honeycombs in more engineering fields. The present study had two purposes: (i) to evaluate the geometrical effect and constituent material effect in determining the mechanical response of additively manufactured hierarchical honeycombs under large deformation; (ii) to verify experimentally the applicability of the existing theoretical models that are used for predicting the mechanical properties of hierarchical honeycombs

Hierarchical Honeycomb Topologies
Method
Mechanical
In-Plane Compression Test of Hierarchical Honeycomb Specimens
Uniaxial
24.3 MPa σys Mechanical
Compressive Stress versus Strain Relations
Deformation Modes of AlSi10Mg Alloy Hierarchical Honeycombs
Deformation Modes of 316L Steel Hierarchical Honeycombs
In-Plane Failure Mechanism of Hierarchical Honeycombs
Compressive Strength
Elastic Modulus
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.