Abstract

LETTERS TO THE EDITORPlasma volume expansion does not influence oxygen uptake kinetics in trained cyclistsGerald S. ZavorskyGerald S. ZavorskyPublished Online:01 Feb 2007https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01029.2006MoreSectionsPDF (29 KB)Download PDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesGet permissionsTrack citations to the editor: I have read the recent article by Berger and colleagues (1) on the effects of plasma volume expansion on oxygen uptake kinetics, peak oxygen uptake, and performance during high-intensity cycling exercise. These researchers have shown that after 7 ml/kg infusion of a plasma volume expander (∼580 ml), and a reduction in hemoglobin concentration by 8%, there was no difference in oxygen uptake kinetics. Nonetheless, maximal oxygen uptake and time to exhaustion increased by 6 and 16%, respectively (1).The lack of a change in oxygen uptake kinetics is not new. The authors have failed to discuss the results of two similar companion papers published recently in which minute ventilation and oxygen uptake kinetics were unchanged from plasma volume expansion compared with control (2, 3). Specifically, a reduction in oxygen delivery during intense exercise by 377 ml/min from plasma volume expansion (3) did not influence oxygen uptake kinetics (2). The similarities between the work of Berger et al. (1) and ours are numerous. First, we both used colloids to expand plasma volume by approximately the same amount. Second, the decrease in hemoglobin concentration caused by plasma volume expansion was approximately the same. Third, we both used high-intensity cycling exercise protocols. Although the aims of our papers were different, our data are worth mentioning because they are highly related to the work of Berger et al. What is different in our results was that contrary to Berger et al., we did not see any change in the peak oxygen uptake after 6.5 min of very strenuous cycling exercise after plasma volume expansion (500 ml Pentaspan), but we did see a significant change in arterial blood acidity (2). However, unlike Berger et al., our subjects were highly trained, and perhaps the level of fitness precluded any increase in oxygen uptake from plasma volume expansion despite lowering arterial pH (2). As well, unlike the study of Berger et al., we also measured cardiac output and stroke volume in our subjects and found no changes in these parameters from expansion. This implies that right ventricular filling was not limited in our very fit subjects. In the case of Berger et al., right ventricular filling may have been limited in these “lower fit” subjects as evidenced by the increase in peak oxygen pulse (1). Therefore, the issue of whether performance and/or maximal oxygen uptake and/or cardiac output is improved with plasma volume expansion still needs to be studied further in various populations (i.e., highly fit vs. recreationally active vs. sedentary subjects), but the issue of whether it affects oxygen uptake kinetics, in my opinion, is answered.REFERENCES1 Berger NJ, Campbell IT, Wilkerson DP, Jones AM. Influence of acute plasma volume expansion on V̇o2 kinetics, V̇o2 peak, and performance during high-intensity cycle exercise. J Appl Physiol 101: 707–714, 2006.Link | ISI | Google Scholar2 Zavorsky GS, Walley KR, Hunte GS, McKenzie DC, Sexsmith GP, Russell JA. Acute hypervolaemia improves arterial oxygen pressure in athletes with exercise-induced hypoxaemia. Exp Physiol 88: 555–564, 2003.Crossref | ISI | Google Scholar3 Zavorsky GS, Walley KR, Hunte GS, McKenzie DC, Sexsmith GP, Russell JA. Acute hypervolemia lengthens red cell pulmonary transit time during exercise in endurance athletes. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 131: 255–268, 2002.Crossref | ISI | Google ScholarAUTHOR NOTESAddress for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. S. Zavorsky, Dept. of Anesthesia, McGill Univ. Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1A4 (e-mail: [email protected]) Download PDF Previous Back to Top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation Cited ByReply to ZavorskyAndrew M. Jones, Nicolas J. Berger, Daryl P. Wilkerson, and Iain T. Campbell1 February 2007 | Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 102, No. 2 More from this issue > Volume 102Issue 2February 2007Pages 828-828 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2007 the American Physiological Societyhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01029.2006PubMed17284661History Published online 1 February 2007 Published in print 1 February 2007 Metrics

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.